Now available thru the Online Book Initiative the KJH. The King James History bible is a historical narrative of the KJ Bible for Christians that leaves out most of the Law that does not pertain to them. Doing so makes the history flow freer and reduces significantly the demands on the reader thru the books of Moses. The contents of the KJH as compared to the KJ are in the order of:
KJ KJH
Genesis Life
Abraham
Joseph
Exodus Oppression
Exodus
Numbers Wilderness
Leviticus
Deuteronomy
Joshua Joshua
Judges Kings
Samuel 1 Samuel
Saul
Samuel 2 David
Kings 1 Solomon
Kings II
Kings 2
Ruth Ruth
Chronicles 1 David's Kingdom
Chronicles 2
Kingdom II
For a more detailed break down of the contents click here.
There are a few surprises in the KJH as in the first book Life the true narrative of Moses account of cosmic development is brot to light that the Aristotelian earth centered ideals clouded up. No attempt was made to make the narrative follow evolutions chronological decent of life. The Noah flood, which represents an archetype (that occurred about 30,000 years ago), is taken out of the narrative as it confuses and not clarifies that there were many floods such as Ogyges that occurred three months after Moses was born (1530 BCE). Old mythologies of past occurrences which the OT has many are made sharp. In the second book Abraham many of the manuscripts past manipulations are put to light showing that Ishmael was born after the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah and that Isaac was born four years later. The narrative makes plain that Abraham abandoned Ishmael at the early age of six and not sixteen. Isaac's prophesy that his son Esau would have the dominion is followed to its proper conclusion. In the third book Joseph the story of Joseph's significance in history is made clear without the blame myths to explain Jacobs fortune in becoming the father of all the tribes. At the end of the book Joseph and Genesis the connection between Joseph and Moses is given to be the Hebrew dynasty that Josephus said was founded by Saites and ruled for about 250 years that came to an end by the flood of Ogyges in 1530 BCE. Manetho makes it plain that Egypt suffered 511 years of foreign domination a year after the disaster. The former rulers and their people were made to serve as labors until Moses was 80 years old. Moses was the son of Apopi the last king of the Hebrew dynasty and he married into the Ethiopian dynasty that ruled Egypt during most of his life. In the fourth book Oppression Moses was considered too threatening and forced into exile. In the fifth book Exodus the reason that drove Pharaoh to go after Moses is given. In the sixth book Wilderness, which is a compilation of a small part of Exodus and the rest of the books of Moses, only the bare minimum of narration is given. The only change in Joshua is the name of mount Ebal in 8:30 to Gerizim as in the Samaritan version. In book Kings (Judges), Samuel, Saul, David, and Solomon no changes of import occur except some chronological information added to help clarify the chronology. Most importantly it is shown that the period from the exodus to the building of the Temple is as traditionally given only 480 years. Book Kings II required a complete rewrite of its chronology because of the efforts of post Jerusalem/ Babylonian historians to rid themselves of their Samaria city competitors by writing them out of history by misplacement putting their end at the siege of Jerusalem (687 BCE) by Sennacherib. The narrative of Jonah, which happened during the reign of Jeroboam II, occurs when Assyria lost its dominion over the region proving that Jeroboam II ruled during the mid 7th century BCE as Assyria did not gain the dominion until Sargon II and did not lose its domination of military power and influence over Egypt until mid rule of Assurbanipal (about 655 BCE). One other internal chronological difficulty occurs when two versions of Ahab's death were worked into the history which can't be reconciled (see part two of the KJH introduction for the solution). Books Ruth and David's Kingdom have no significant changes except that the latter book focuses more narrowly on David. Book Kingdom II changes the chronological order after Jehoshaphat as explained in part two of the introduction.
From: Jehoshaphat To: Jehoshaphat
Joram Ahaziah
Ahaziah Joram
Athaliah Amaziah
Joash Joash
Amaziah
For those interested in chronological matters there is a vast array of subjects (Israel, Egypt, Assyria, Sumeria) covering the full range of dynasties from the 34th century BCE to the present age and even the whole Roman period to the end of ancient times in the introduction of KJH. Part four of the introduction includes astronomical proofs of two heavenly bodies that encountered the earth in 30 and 31 year cycles. See OSS to find where these two heavenly bodies originated. These cycles are the foundation of the reaffirmed chronologies using only traditional time periods given by the ancients. Unbounded by the present astronomical paradigm the true flow of history is clear for all to see. In part five of the introduction the King lists are given. Israel chronology is fully explained in the KJH introduction first thru third parts. Even if all solutions presented for ancient Israel chronology in the introduction are rejected, the solution that the periods of enslavement during the Judges period where concurrent to the Judges rule establishes the fact that only 480 years passed from the exodus to the building of the Temple. No single development will have a greater impact in the field of chronology. The Egyptian chronology follows the traditional date of the beginning of its fourth dynasty in 2550 BCE. The beginning of Egypt's first dynasty adds up to 3046 BCE and the traditions of its first Kings with a period of 350 years places the beginning period when human kings began to rule the earth at 3396 BCE. From the first dynasty to the Middle Kingdom 1002 years went by which leaves no place for the first intermediate period as it is an artificial construct to fill an artificial chronological scheme. The Middle Kingdom period began at the Fall of Ur III in the middle 21st century BCE as atested by Hebrew sources. The eleven centuries of dispute from the end of the twelfth dynasty (1774 BCE) to Psammetichos (672 BCE) is completely filled by what the ancients wrote and there are no places for any intermediate periods. After the twelfth the Saites dynasty ruled for about 250 years leaving nine centuries, which Manetho fills 511 years with foreign occupation and the rest of the four centuries beginning with the New Kingdom to the celebration of Seti the Great of the four hundredth year of the founding of a temple that was built at the founding of the New Kingdom. From this analysis it can be seen that the 19th dynasty and the 26th dynasty are one and the same. See Manetho and how his three books correspond to this chronology. However it is analized, from the Middle Kingdom to the New Kingdom 1026 years passed and from the New Kingdom to the Roman period 995 years passed. In Assyrian chronology the kings Tilgath-Pileser III, Sargon II, and Shalmaneser V are mistaken to be different individuals when they are all the same person, which is made difficult to see as the relationship of Sennacherib son of Sargon II is mirrored in a Shalmaneser V supposed son of Tilgath-Pileser III. Much of what was assigned to Tilgath-Pileser III in the past has been reassigned to Sargon II. After Assurbanipal the chronology is unsure and the end year for Assur-ballit II is supplied by Hebrew and Babylonian sources. In Sumerian chronology the beginning period is found thru Egyptian sources to be 3396 BCE. Using the well known 60 cycle century the large reigns are divided by 60. The first dynasty ends at 3103/2 which is know as Kali Yuga (the date of a new world age). Only in the fifth dynasty is there a missing king (Dadasig) reign years in the list, but the whole length of the dynasty is known so it is possible to fill it in. The end of Ur III is 2044 BCE which exactly matches Hebrew and Manetho's independent sources. Stacking dynasty one on top of the other just as the lists were found to be on the original texts gives Hammurabi to be a contemporary of Moses as the analysis of the Law of Moses and Hammurabi's law code suggest. The Venus tablets of Ammisiduqa show a correspondence to cycles of encounters that do not repeat regularly in the same time intervals together except over very long periods of time which suggests that its placement that fits to a tea is correct. Except for when Hittite chronology begins most of this dynasty is speculative until the reign of Suppiluliumas whos reign ends at the fall of Thebes Egypt and where afterwards one of his sons ruled Egypt. Exact year chronology begins with Mursilis II who is in fact Nabopolossar. The Persian Empire ruled for 246 years according to Josephus that is supported by bible chronology. The record that Artaxerxes II ruled to his 65th year of reign is corrupt and should be 56th year or just over 55 years. Roman chronology is straightforward and in correct sequence except on two occasions but out of sync with the present age by four years farther from our time. The first year of Philip was the year the secular millennium games were celebrated (248 CE) of Rome's founding (753 BCE). Both Claudius and Vespasian each lose a year as Seyffarth's thesis correctly demonstrates that on two occasions consules suffecti were mistaken for consuls in AD 46 and AD 78 where the year of death of Augustus is given at AD 14. These corrections place the death of Augustus to 20 CE. These issues have enormous consequences for any historic proof that the ephemeris is valid.
Thru the OBI from
The author encourages all to email their comments and especially any errors of whatever form to: cconway@freenet.tlh.fl.us
It simply is not possible to edit a book the size of the OT and the complexity of the subjects in the introduction to not let errors slip by.I make no excuses. All errors are mine and I claim them. All truth found in KJH I make no claim to as they are God's.
God's blessings to all
All these efforts made making KJH a money free adventure for myself.
KJ KJH
Gen [1-5,10-11] Life
[12-16,18-20,17,21-33,37,35-36] Abraham
[39,41-43,45-50] Joseph
Exodus [1-12] Oppression
[13-20,24,31-34,23] Exodus
[23] } Wilderness
Num [10-14] + }
Lev [10] + }
Num [16-17,20-27,31-34] + }
Deu [1-3,31,34] }
Joshua Joshua
Judges Kings
Sam [1-12] Samuel
[13-31] Saul
Sam 2 [1-24] + } David
Kings [1-2] }
[2-11] Solomon
[12-22] } Kings II
Kings 2 [1-10,14,11-15] + }
[Isaiah 1,6,13,24] + }
[15-16] + }
[Isaiah 20,19] + }
[15,13,18-20,14,21] + }
[Jonah 1-4] + }
[22-23,15,24,17] }
Ruth Ruth
Chron 1 [10-29] + } David's Kingdom
Chron 2 [1-9] }
[10-25,24,26-36] Kingdom II
Evidence of past catastrophes in the solar system will be reviewed. The formative order of the planets of the solar system will be established and a reconstruction of past catastrophic events in the solar system leading to its present chaotic state will be suggested.
Today, not all the planets in our solar system have rotations in the same direction as the Sun which is the primary having vastly more mass than any other body in the system. This strongly suggests that sometime in the past a star encountered our solar system and disrupted the system. Buffon (1745) was the first to suggest a solar disturbance (by a comet). Bickerton (1878) was the first to suggest a solar disturbance by another star followed by Chamberlin (1901), Moulton (1905), Arrhenius (1913), Jeffrey (1913), and Jeans (1917). Yet the contradictions of our non uniformed solar system such as Triton, a satellite of Neptune that revolves against Neptune's rotation, forced suggesting double, Russell (1935) and Hoyle (1944), and triple, Lyttleton (1936), star encounters. But even multiple star encounters in and of themselves are insufficient explanations. While there is wide disagreement on how disturbances could have occurred, there is full agreement that the Asteroid Belt between Mars and Jupiter represents the remains of some catastrophe that occurred in the past of our solar system.
With the evidence suggesting that disturbances have occurred in our solar system, the present planetary order can not be assumed to be the formative order. If it is assumed that the Sun formed the planets, then the density of a planet would have developed in the relationship of its formative placement meaning that the closer the planet was to the Sun the greater its density would be. Using planet densities to determine their formative positions places both Neptune and Uranus between Mars and Jupiter (see density chart). If the human body which is molded by the same universal forces of nature that the solar system formed in is held as a templet to the density chart order, the proportional mass ratios give the planets an order and spacing of Mercury (1) {ankle}, Earth (2) {mid-calf}, Venus (3) {upper-calf}, Mars (4) {knee cap}, Neptune (8) {mid-thigh}, Uranus (12) {hip joint}, Jupiter (16) {torso}, and Saturn (32) {head}. With a model of the solar systems formative state, it is possible to reconstruct such events that have led to the solar systems present chaotic order. In the past a star encountered our solar system disturbing the paths of Neptune and Uranus around the Sun. During this disturbance Neptune and Uranus struck each other a glancing blow that created the Asteroid Belt between Mars and Jupiter. The blow redirected the velocity of both planets changing their orbits to be beyond Saturn, reversed the planets magnetic poles by the exchange of electrical discharges between them, and reversed by gravity both satellite systems direction of path. The result being that Neptune lost four of its five satellites that became free bodies in the solar system around the Sun.
In this model Earth and Venus switched positions in the past and may have exchanged electrical discharges without striking another as Neptune and Uranus did. The difficulty is that both Earth and Neptune have non-retrograde rotations unlike their sister planets Venus and Uranus. The question is why and are these singular irregularities actually related and is the Earth's unusual Moon the connection? If the Earth encountered Neptune after its disturbance, then such an encounter between Earth and Neptune could cause electrical discharge between them and again reverse their poles back to their original orientation. This scenario would also explain why the direction of Triton's path around Neptune was not affected again in the same manner as the Uranus' encounter. Neptune's role in creating the Moon would be the greatest catastrophic event that ever occurred to the Earth. The greatest catastrophic event that ever occurred to the Earth was the K-T event sixty-five million years ago. Sixty-five million years is a very short time for a star to travel as the Sun, traveling 20 Km/second, has gone only 4 1/3 light years in that time. If the star that encountered the Sun is traveling the same velocity as the Sun but in an opposing direction, it would be about 8 2/3 light years away from the Sun. The star Sirius is 8.7 light years from the Sun. Earth's position in the model is second, but Earth's density is greater than Mercury's. What could have caused Earth's density to increase? The mass necessary to increase Earth's density of the models second position to be greater than Mercury's density in the first position would be greater than the mass of Mercury itself.
Since multiple disruptions have occurred in our solar system, only Uranus' satellite system has survived intact without major distortion because that systems mass ratios to its primary allowed the planet to protect its system just as Jupiter was able to except for its inner-most satellite (Shanleena) which now resides as Jupiter's Great Red Spot. Neptune now only has Triton as a naturally formed satellite, but satellite systems have mass relationships so its former members can be known by calculation from the base of Triton's mass. If Jupiter and Uranus satellite systems are used as a model of mass spacing, it suggests that Titan is Triton's former sister satellite, Pluto its former jovian satellite of that former system, the former outer-most saturnian satellite (Oceanus) calculates to be greater in mass than the planet Mercury, and the former inner-most satellite (Vulcan) is calculated to be about 1% of the Earth's mass. Titan is more than 20 times the mass of all the rest of Saturn's satellites combined and Pluto has been suggested to be a lost satellite of Neptune by Lyttleton [1]. If the model of Uranus and Jupiter is correct for natural satellite systems, then the whole system of Saturn's satellites have been disrupted. The sister satellites, Dione and Tethys, have switched positions and Iapetus is too distant from Saturn. Question is did the star (Sirius) disrupt Saturn's satellite system or are other explanations possible? If in fact it was a star, then it would be impossible for Neptune, Uranus, or Pluto to have been in their present positions. Another indication of disruptions is Uranus' tilt of axis that suggests Uranus struck Neptune with one of its poles creating Neptune's Dark Spot.
Every major non-uniform anomaly of the solar system has now been given an explanation naming all agents involved. The solar system's formative planetary order has been changed by a disturbance caused by an encounter with a star (Sirius) sixty-five million years ago when Neptune and Uranus were between Mars and Jupiter. In that disturbance Neptune lost four of its five satellites that became free bodies around the Sun and interacted with other bodies of the solar system. Some of the mountains of Mars are greater than Earth's which is what would be expected from such encounters [2]. The lost satellites of Neptune are responsible for Earth's continental shifting, mountain building of ranges scale, periodic mass extinctions of same episodic events, and polar reversals.
For those that have the tools that are needed to make mathematical models of the interactions suggested in this paper, it would be prudent to note that the present orbital calculated mass for the system of Sirius of 3.34 solar masses is contrary to uniform principles that common stars would have nearly the same densities. Sirius B is taken to be 0.99 solar masses and is considered a most uncommon star. If Sirius A had the same density as the Sun, then Sirius A at 1.76 diameters of the Sun would be about 5.5 solar masses or twice its orbital calculated mass and density. It is said by the Dogon that the system of Sirius has another companion and that this Sirius C has the same orbital period as Sirius B but a greater orbit [3]. If this is true, then the unusual nature of Sirius B should be taken into account. If Sirius B is the jovian planet of that system, then Sirius C is the saturnian planet of that system with an orbital distance about twice Sirius B. An orbital calculation of the mass for the system of Sirius with Sirius C at twice the distance but the same period as Sirius B gives a calculated orbital mass of about 5.5 solar masses for Sirius A.
Saturn 0.48 Jupiter 0.95 Uranus 1.14 Neptune 1.61 Mars 2.77 Venus 3.73 Mercury 3.85 Earth 3.91 Sun 1
An overview of each of the books reveals that Afracanus gives a period of 2300 for both the first (dynasties 1-11) and second book (dynasties 12-19) plus a period of 1050 for the third book (dynasties 20-31), which is a half period that Excerpta Latina Barbari gives for the first book 2100 and 1520 for the second book. The actual numbers tho for the first book are 2260 (Excerpta) and 2237 (Afracanus), the second book 1420 (Excerpta) and 2222 (Afracanus), and 909 years for the third book. A comparison of the dynasties from the different versions indicates that Excerpta starts with numbering the "Spirits of the Dead" as its first dynasty and Mineus as its second dynasty, but in Afracanus' version Menes is its first dynastic founder. The same correlation continues until the eighth of Excerpta and seventh of Afracanus where at that point Excerpta does not use any of the first intermidate dynasties (7-10) but uses the 11th ,12th, and 15th dynasties to end its first book. In the second book Afracanus has dynasties 12-19 while Excerpta has them numbered 11-17, but they are obviously dynasties 12-18 with the 19th as missing for the so called 14 is the the 15th (20 years less than its real length of 244), the numbered 16 is the 17th (70 years greater than its real length of 151), and the numbered 17 is obviously the 18th. This makes the total for the Excerpta version of the second book using the real numbers as indicated above that leaves out the 19th dynasty 150 less against the given length of 1520. The third book can be made to meet its given length of 1050 by using the actual dynastic periods (see dynasty lists below).
The beginning of the Middle Kingdom is known to have started in the mid eleventh dynasty in the mid 21st century BCE, but the end of Excerpta's first book ends with what is the 15th dynasty. The second book ends with the 19th dynasty and the third book ends with the 30th dynasty as Egypts last native dynasty before the present age. The common theme that runs thru each book is that they all end when Egypt experienced a period of foreign rule. Working backwards to find when the second book ends is helped by the fact that its beginning century (21st BCE) is known and so a 2300 or 2100 year length for this period can be reasonably rejected. If the end of the 19th dynasty begins the period of Persian domination (524 BCE - Ptolemy's Cannon), then the period of 1520 years in the Excerpta version places the beginning of the Middle Kingdom at 2044 BCE (524 + 1520 = 2044) which exactly matches the independent Hebrew and Sumerian sources. This proves that the 19th dynasty of the second book and the 26th dynasty of the third book are one and the same. No tombs of the 26th dynasty are known to exist. Afracanus gives 150 years as the length of the 26th dynasty which is the length missing from Excerpta that is missing its 19th dynasty to end its second book. The third book ends with the conquest of Egypt by Alexander (III) the Great and the second book ends with the conquest of Egypt by Cambyses (II) the Persian in his fifth year.
To know when the third book begins is to understand it purpose. The length given to the third book of 1050 years can be seen as artificial as it was likely only used to fit another artifical construct (Sothis period of 1460 years). Adding 1050 to the date Alexander came to Egypt (331 BCE) gives 1381 BCE with the period ending in 80 CE, which is about where some sources place a Sothis period ending. The first four dynasties of the third book add up to 511 years, which suggests that these dynasties are the dynasties of foreign occupation that Manetho indicated. Since the second book is independent of both the first book of Excerpta and the third book, the end of the first book of Excerpta and the beginning of the third book continue from each other and the beginning of the third book starts with the period of Egyptian domination that ends the first book (Excerpta). The twelfth dynasty ends about 1780 BCE where next Josephus places the dynasty founded by Saites or the same dynasty that ends the first book of Excerpta for about 250 years ending in 1530 BCE where Hebrew sources place the birth of Moses and the beginning of foreign domination in Egypt. If the period of foreign domination of 511 years is subtracted from the actual beginning of book three, then the New Kingdom period begins about 1020 BCE and the 18th dynasty ends at 776 BCE where Babylonian sources place the sack of Thebes by Suppiluliumas whos son ruled Egypt for 20 years after his father died (776 BCE). The full length of the 19th dynasty is 234 years (776 BCE - 234 = 542 BCE or the fifth year of Cambyses II), but Afracanus gives the 19th dynasty only 209 years by not counting the first two rulers in Suppiluliumas' son for 20 years and his sons successor for 5 years (234 - 25 = 209). Other lengths are given for this dynasty in the third book as a period of Ethiopian rule for 44 years fits in the middle of this dynasty so some periods that are given are 150, 163, and 167 (209 - 44 = 165). Inexact lengths are not to be unexpected as they were used for cabbalastic chronology. The length of the first book is problematic even when knowing its end (1530 BCE). Adding 2300 and 2100 to 1530 BCE does not offer any meaningful results. The actual number of Afracanus' first book of 2237 over reaches by 5 years from a known calendar reform date (Hebrew sources) that occurred in 3762 BCE or 2232 years from 1530 BCE. Whether or not this is the target for book one I leave the reader to disconcern.
Dynasty Lists Manetho's three books of Egyptian chronology First Book Excerpta Latina Barbari Afracanus I Spirits of the Dead Dynasty II Mineus + 7 kings 253 1 Menes 252 III Bochus + 8 kings 302 2 Bochus 297 IV Necherocheus + 7 kings 214 3 Necheroches 197 V 17 kings 277 4 Soris 448* VI 21 kings 258 5 100* VII Othoi + 7 kings 203 6 Othoes 203 VIII 14 kings 140 7 70 kings 70 days IX 20 kings 409 8 5 kings 146 100* X 7 kings 204 9 4 kings 409 100* ---- 10 19 kings 185 2100 2260 11 ____ 2300 2237 Second Book XI Diopolis 60 12 Diopolis 160 XII Bubastus 153 13 60 kings 453 XIII Tanis 184 14 76 kings 184 XIV Sebennytus 224 15 Saites 284 XV Memphis 318 16 Shepherd 518 XVI Heliopolis 221 17 151 XVII Hermupolis 260 18 Amoses 263 ____ 19 Sethos 209 1520 1420 ---- 2121 2222 Third Book Actual($) 178* 20 12 kings 172# $ 140 21 Smendes 130 $ 210 22 Sesonchis 120 $ 84 5 23 Petubates 89___511 6 24 Bochchoris 6 44 25 Sabacon 44* 167# 26 Ameres 150 $ 128 27 Cambyses 120 6 28 Amyrteos 6 20 29 Nepherites 20 $ 48 30 Nectanebes 38 9 5 31 Ochus 14* ---- -- --- 1040 + 10 = 1050 1050 909 * Eusebius # Armenian version
Designed by Knowledge Computer on behalf of Clayton Conway.